{"id":400,"date":"2017-08-10T18:41:16","date_gmt":"2017-08-10T23:41:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/utsaengineer.wpengine.com\/kcastillo\/?page_id=400"},"modified":"2017-09-15T15:53:57","modified_gmt":"2017-09-15T20:53:57","slug":"visualizing-data","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/ceid.utsa.edu\/kcastillo\/visualizing-data\/","title":{"rendered":"Visualizing Data"},"content":{"rendered":"

Optimal Solutions<\/h1>\n

BACK<\/a><\/p>\n

Baseline 10%:<\/strong>\u00a0Solutions based on current climate conditions with the power plant operating at a 10% co-firing rate.<\/p>\n

Baseline 20%:<\/strong>\u00a0Solutions based on current climate conditions with the power plant operating at a 20% co-firing rate.<\/p>\n

A2 20%:<\/strong>\u00a0Solutions based on a scenario that represents an extremely pessimistic future, which assumes large pollution increase,halted economic growth,and not much progress in the change of technology. A2 also predicts a substantial increase in carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere as well as in temperature with the power plant operating at a 20% co-firing rate.<\/p>\n

B2 20%:<\/strong>\u00a0Solutions based on this scenario correspond to a moderate increase in CO2 levels in the atmosphere and a smaller increase in temperature with the power plant operating at a 20% co-firing rate.<\/p>\n

<\/div>